Christianity: The Peaceful Religion That's Always at War

Fabian Fucan attacked Christianity in multiple ways after he left the religion, such as:

• Religiously- He claimed that the Christian God, Deus, was very clever in the presentation of his teachings, but offered little truth, basically claiming he was an evil God.
• Culturally- Claims that their God and the Jesuits are attempting to overthrow the very tradition of Japanese culture.
• Historically- Claims that since the very beginning, the leaders of Japan had been chosen by Japanese gods, and that Deus is planning to subvert that tradition.
• Politically- The institution of Christianity would overthrow the lineage of emperors, as explained in the historical aspect of his attack.
• Socially- The Japanese people would not be weak like those of Mexico and the Philippines, and would hold true to their traditions and not fall to Christianity.

Sorry it's a little late to be put up on the blog!

Slave trade show me
Hi Mr. Whitten, just a note, I forgot to post this on my blog, but if you notice I sent it to your whitten@bpsk12 account on Sunday night, so I was hoping you could please accept this as an on time assignment. Thank you so much!

Capitalism: Refined

After doing the reading, my idea of capitalism has changed slightly. I now see that at it's roots, it is private companies deciding large scale economic decisions, not the government. So my definition of it being elected representatives making decisions is nothing close to what it actually is. I also see that it works under the forces of supply and demand. This is where my part about great opportunity for businesses comes into play, because if you have something of great demand, you're going to have a lot of people buying your product, and therefore you have tremendous opportunity to get rich. But if you have a product of no demand, you have the ability to get very poor as well. Also, capitalism helped bring about the rise of stocks and banks, two of the industries that our modern world couldn't live without.

Capitalism for Dummies

Capitalism is one of man kind's best inventions. It allows for great opportunity among every person. It allows the poorest of the poor to rise up and become the richest of the rich. Capitalism, or at least American capitalism, is having elected representatives of different political parties and beliefs to argue their view points in what they would think would be best for the state. Of course, in this system of government, not everybody is gonna be happy all the time, because not everybody is going to get their hopes to come true. But on the opposite ends of the spectrum are Communism and Facism, one a complete dictorship by definition and the other a complete equality of people by definition. The beauty of capitalism is that it allows voices to be heard, whereas in other forms of government voices are either totally suppressed or blended together.

Christendom, What happened to you?

Over the course of 1500 years, from the death of Jesus to the era of exploration and Martin Luther, the basic values of Christendom changed tremendously. I believe that Jesus was just a man who preached "be good people", which was absolutely a righteous cause. But I believe that human's are also selfish, and when Christianity rose as the major religious power in Europe, those selfish humans saw the ability to bend it to their will to accomplish personal goals. For instance, European monarchs would use the "because god said I was king" excuse to uphold their power. And because there was no way to prove or disprove this, the peasants believed it. This allowed monarchs to raise money to build armies to conquer. This is where Luther had the same problem as me, and so he attempted to bring Christianity back to the more traditional message of "be good people". Of course, this problem is still existant today by politicians and heads of churches, using the bible and Jesus to prevent the development of society as a whole for their own selfish purposes.

The Griots, not bigots

Pros-

• Transmitted from a primary source
• Easily spread, and spread faster than a textbook
• A form of entertainment in the spread of the stories

Cons-

• More room for variability in the transmission of the history
• More of a possibility of losing the history forever if it's not appealing to the public audience

I think that although more entertaining than textbook  history, the Griots are a worse form of the transmission of history. The only definitive way of having the history as it actually happened is for it to be written down. The transfer of history through word of mouth only defiles the story as it gets passed along, because everybody adds their own little thing to it. However, if history is written down originally, that exact same story can be copied word for word, and there's way less of possibility that the history will be defiled.

In conclusion: Textbooks.

Mongol Blogol

The trial may have been my favorite thing we've done so far in AP World. Everybody got so into it, and it was exciting debating this because as the saying goes "The victor writes history". The mongols were never tried for their crimes before because nobody was powerful enough to put them on trial, but now that they were, it's interesting to see what modern day crimes they would be committed of! Plus it was relatively easy to prep for, which makes a fun assignment even more fun!
As for myself, I thought I did a good job portraying Guillaume Boucher. I thought my feelings of being kidnapped from Europe and brought back to Karakorum were realistic and helped my team to win the case in kidnapping.
I thought that Genghis Khan himself was admirable. He had a goal and he set out to achieve it, which he did. And the fact that he had standards of "No harming women or children" showed that he had compassion in that mean persona somewhere. The mongols as a whole on the other hand I do not appreciate in the slightest. It seems that even though they were good fighters, they were ruthless and didn't follow humanitarian orders in the slightest. Only to kill and ravage whoever they defeated.
For the counts of guilty or not guilty, I say

• Kidnapping: Totally and utterly 100% guilty
• Terrorism: Guilty
• Genocide: Not guilty, because they did not target a specific group of people, but persons of many different ethnicities and beliefs, which defies the definition of "genocide".